TEST TW WEATHER

September 11, 2009 Critics say wind turbines hurt land values

By Thomas Content of the Journal Sentinel

 

Plugged In
Energy writer Thomas Content keeps you current as you adapt to changes
in the world of energy, climate change and efforts to build a greener
economy.

Climate bill: Report touts efficiency gains, utilities renew protest
Conference stresses the ROI of green
Dairyland joins Midwest wholesale power market
View All Blog Posts
Land values have fallen on properties near wind turbines built as part
of the largest wind power projects in the state, a study funded by
wind-power critics says.

The study found property values have fallen by at least 19% for sales
of land near the We Energies wind farm in Fond du Lac County, and at
least 12% for sales of land near Invenergy LLC’s Forward Wind project
in Fond du Lac and Dodge counties, a report by Appraisal Group One
says.

The appraisal firm’s study was commissioned by a Calumet County
affiliate of the state Coalition for Wisconsin Environmental
Stewardship, a group that is opposing We Energies’ Glacier Hills wind
farm project in Columbia County and seeks to preserve local control
over wind-siting decisions.

The study was released days before the Legislature is expected to take
up a wind-siting reform bill aimed at providing standardized
permitting procedures for wind power projects across the state.

A representative of the American Wind Energy Association declined to
comment on the study. We Energies spokesman Brian Manthey said the
utility was still reviewing the report, but he said it’s hard to judge
how much the decline in property values was caused by proximity to
turbines, given that the decline also occurred during the housing
market’s collapse and the worst economy in generations.

“The times that we are in really make it difficult to say
. . . what is affecting home sales or land sales,” he
said.

Bob Welch, who is lobbying on behalf of the anti-wind group, said he
hoped legislators will take a second look at the siting bill in light
of the report, saying the bill in Madison would stop local governments
from setting restrictions requiring turbines to be located far from
homes.

The bill would essentially give the issue to the state Public Service
Commission, which would set up a proceeding to determine proper
setbacks for wind turbines and other siting issues.

Kurt Kielisch, president of Appraisal Group One, said his study found
living near wind turbines has a bigger impact on property values than
other studies he’s done. His other studies have examined the impact of
transmission lines and gas pipelines on property values.

The study found an average price decline of 30% to 40% in land values
for property sales that were near turbines.

The main objection, he said, is aesthetics.

“The focus of people who move to the country is kind of to be left
alone to enjoy the quiet and the scenery, and when you have things
changing the scenery like windmills tend to do, that puts more of an
industrial urban feel into the country,” he said.

The firm’s study’s findings run counter to a national study that
issued a preliminary finding this year that found “no statistical
evidence that homes near wind facilities are stigmatized by those
facilities as compared to other homes in the region.”

That study, by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, reviewed
wind projects in 10 states including a wind farm in Kewaunee County.

Ben Hoen, a co-author of the Berkeley study, said Friday that he could
not comment on the Wisconsin case. The Berkeley study was funded by
the U.S. Department of Energy, he said in an e-mail.

Supporters of the wind-permitting legislation said Friday that they
don’t expect the study to delay the state’s action on the wind-siting
reform bill.

“This is sort of the classic tactic of the wind opponents,” wind
industry lobbyist Curt Pawlisch said. “Come up with something and
throw it in and see what happens. This is one more reason why you need
to have a calm setting, through a deliberative rulemaking process at
the PSC.”